We are currently experiencing some problems with logins to our library catalog. Â If you need to place a hold, or manage your account please login using your X-number and your “PIN” in the password box. Â Â If you need to know your “PIN” please contact the library for more details.
On Thursday March 3rd at 10:30 pm the library will be performing maintenance on library systems. During that time you may experience slow searches, or an inability to view library resources including the library web page.
This routine maintenance is planned to be over by midnight.
Please plan accordingly.
The library online catalog will be undergoing maintenance from Wednesday January 13, to Friday January 15th.
During that time the catalog and some features of the library website may have erratic behavior. Â Cover art, availability information, Holds, and My Account features will all be affected. Â Searching for materials should still work as normal.
Please bear with us during this requiredÂ maintenance. Â We apologize for any inconvenience. Â As always if you need any assistance, please contact the library directly at: (630) 466-7900 Ext. 2400.
In many fields of research right now, scientists collect data until they see a pattern that appears statistically significant, and then they use that tightly selected data to publish a paper. Critics have come to call this p-hacking, and the practice uses a quiver of little methodological tricks that can inflate the statistical significance of a finding. As enumerated by one research group, the tricks can include:
- â€œconducting analyses midway through experiments to decide whether to continue collecting data,â€
- â€œrecording many response variables and deciding which to report postanalysis,â€
- â€œdeciding whether to include or drop outliers postanalyses,â€
- â€œexcluding, combining, or splitting treatment groups postanalysis,â€
- â€œincluding or excluding covariates postanalysis,â€
- â€œand stopping data exploration if an analysis yields a significant p-value.â€
Add it all up, and you have a significant problem in the way our society produces knowledge.
The number of individuals in prison around the world for raising their voices online is on the rise. In 2014, the Committee to Protect Journalists found that over half of imprisoned journalists were arrested for activities conducted on the Internet. In a 2015 report, Reporters Without Borders cited 178 incidents of imprisoned â€œnetizensâ€ in just a selection of twelve countries. Now that individuals can speak up without the need for institutions or gatekeepers, states choose the most direct way to take away their power: incarcerating them, and taking them offline.
It’s not just those who speak out who are sent to jail. Increasingly, EFF has seen coders, designers, makers, and hackers detained or threatened with prison for their work protecting or enhancing free expression and privacy. Writers, speakers, and journalists have long been understood by those in power as dangerous elements; now â€œtechnologistâ€ has joined the list of occupations that corrupt politicians and dictators fear.
EFF supports the principles of free expression laid out in Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and believes that those principles must extend online. The right â€œto seek, receive and impart informationâ€ includes a right to devise and share tools that enable and protect those abilities.
â€œOfflineâ€ showcases key cases that may not be receiving wide coverage, but we believe speak to a wider audience concerned with online freedom. Our international case advocacy is centered around awareness-raising. Over the years, we have often heard from those who have been released from detention that shining a spotlight on their case led to better treatment in prison or a speedier release. It is from this premise that we work, additionally ensuring that we have full support of an individualâ€™s loved ones before we proceed with action.