Does everyone have the right to unlimited access to digital content? Internet access is a human right / Internet access is not a human right / Children's and teenagers' Internet and social media access should be limited / Young people need full access to the Internet to thrive in the modern world / Access to digital content should not be restricted by digital rights management technology / Digital rights management and encryption protect information, but there are risks / Should the government or social media platforms restrict digital content? Governments should not control Internet access and content / Governments are right to censor some forms of online content / First Amendment protection of free speech should not apply to social media platforms / First Amendment protections should be extended to social media platforms / Section 230 correctly shields websites and social media platforms from legal liability / Section 230 allows tech giants to promote harmful content / Internet freedom can promote both democracy and authoritarianism / Should individual data be collected by law enforcement and corporations? Law enforcement should be able to use data to keep citizens safe / Technological surveillance by law enforcement can lead to questionable police conduct / Private companies should not profit from digital data they mine from customers / Gang databases help improve public safety / Cookies allow government entities and corporations to monitor users / How much of a right to privacy should Internet users expect? Internet users need more rigorous laws to protect their privacy / Privacy concerns should not inhibit the embrace of useful new technologies / Internet users have a right to anonymity / Anonymity encourages abusive and hateful speech in digital environments / Internet users have a "right to be forgotten" / Individuals cannot expect to erase all embarrassing online information